Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated esophageal disease characterised by eosinophil-predominant inflammation, leading to esophageal dysfunction and dysphagia. Effective management focuses on reducing esophageal eosinophilia and improving symptoms. The three primary treatment modalities for EoE-related dysphagia relief are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), topical corticosteroids, and dietary elimination.
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presents a significant clinical challenge, with dysphagia being the most common and debilitating symptom. The underlying pathology involves an allergic inflammatory response within the esophageal mucosa, leading to fibrosis and stricture formation.1 Management strategies aim to control this inflammation, thereby alleviating symptoms and preventing disease progression. The current evidence supports three main therapeutic approaches: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), topical corticosteroids, and dietary elimination.2
Pharmacological and Dietary Interventions for EoE
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often the initial therapeutic choice for EoE. While traditionally used for acid suppression, PPIs have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in the esophageal mucosa, independent of their acid-reducing properties.3 Studies indicate that PPIs can induce histological remission (defined as fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-power field) in approximately 50% of adult EoE patients.4 Symptomatic improvement, including relief from dysphagia, is observed in a similar proportion of patients. The mechanism is thought to involve inhibition of eotaxin-3 expression and modulation of tight junction proteins.3
Topical corticosteroids, such as fluticasone propionate and budesonide, are highly effective in treating EoE. These agents are administered orally, typically as a swallowed slurry or spray, allowing direct contact with the esophageal mucosa.5 Fluticasone propionate, delivered via a metered-dose inhaler and swallowed, has shown histological remission rates ranging from 70% to 80% in both adult and paediatric populations.6 Budesonide, often formulated as an oral viscous slurry, demonstrates similar efficacy, with remission rates also in the 70-80% range.7 Both agents significantly improve dysphagia and other EoE symptoms. The main adverse event associated with topical corticosteroids is oral candidiasis, which occurs in approximately 5-10% of patients and is typically managed with antifungal therapy.6,7
Dietary elimination therapy involves identifying and removing specific food allergens that trigger the inflammatory response in EoE. The most common approach is the six-food elimination diet (SFED), which removes milk, wheat, soy, egg, peanut/tree nuts, and fish/shellfish.8 This broad elimination diet has shown high efficacy, with histological remission rates of 70-75%.9 However, the SFED is restrictive and requires subsequent reintroduction of foods with endoscopic biopsies to identify specific triggers, which can be burdensome for patients.8 A more targeted approach, such as allergy testing-directed elimination, has lower efficacy (approximately 40-50% remission) but is less restrictive.10 Elemental diets, consisting of amino acid-based formulas, are the most effective dietary therapy, achieving remission in over 90% of patients, but are generally reserved for severe cases or those unresponsive to other therapies due to their palatability and cost.11
The choice of therapy often depends on patient preference, disease severity, and response to initial treatment. While PPIs offer a convenient first-line option, topical corticosteroids provide higher remission rates. Dietary therapy, particularly SFED, is highly effective but demands significant patient adherence and diagnostic follow-up. Combination therapies are also employed in refractory cases.12
The continued reliance on PPIs, topical corticosteroids, and dietary elimination for EoE management underscores a persistent gap in novel therapeutic development. While these treatments are effective, their limitations are well-documented: PPIs only work for half of patients, topical steroids carry a candidiasis risk, and dietary elimination is notoriously difficult to sustain. Clinicians are left navigating a landscape where the 'best' option is often the one a patient can adhere to, rather than a definitively superior pharmacological agent. This situation highlights the need for more targeted, less burdensome therapies that offer higher remission rates without significant lifestyle disruption.
From an industry perspective, the market for EoE treatments remains ripe for innovation. The current therapeutic arsenal, while functional, does not fully address the unmet needs of all patients. The development of novel biologics, such as dupilumab, which recently received FDA approval for EoE, represents a significant step forward. However, the high cost and administration route of such therapies mean that the established, more affordable options will likely remain the first line for many. Pharmaceutical companies should focus not only on entirely new mechanisms but also on improving the delivery and tolerability of existing effective compounds, perhaps through novel formulations of topical steroids that minimise candidiasis risk or enhance esophageal retention.
Patients with EoE face a chronic condition requiring long-term management, often involving repeated endoscopies and biopsies to monitor disease activity. The burden of dietary elimination, particularly for children, is substantial, impacting quality of life and potentially nutritional status. The availability of multiple effective options is a strength, but the lack of a single, universally effective, and easily administered treatment means patients must often cycle through therapies or combine them. This necessitates robust patient education and shared decision-making, ensuring that the chosen treatment aligns with individual circumstances and preferences, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. The goal should be sustained remission, not just symptomatic relief, to prevent long-term complications like strictures.
- The Pivot Established treatments continue to form the cornerstone of EoE management, with ongoing refinement in their application.
- The Data PPIs achieve histological remission in approximately 50% of adult EoE patients, while topical corticosteroids show remission rates of 70-80%.
- The Action Clinicians should initiate treatment with PPIs, escalating to topical corticosteroids or dietary elimination if symptoms persist or histological remission is not achieved.
ART-2026-117
Cite This Article
Team TLSFE. Top three treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis dysphagia relief. The Life Science Feed. Updated May 28, 2026. Accessed May 28, 2026. https://thelifesciencefeed.com/gastroenterology/inflammatory-bowel-diseases/top-three-treatments-eosinophilic-esophagitis-dysphagia-relief.
Licence & Rights
© 2026 The Life Science Feed. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all content is the property of The Life Science Feed and may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.
Editorial & AI Standards
All content is researched from peer-reviewed, open-access sources — published trial data, clinical guidelines, and regulatory filings. AI tools are used solely to structure and summarise that evidence; no AI-generated conclusions appear without editor verification against the primary source.
Every article is reviewed by a named editor before publication. Source citations are listed in the References section. This content does not represent the views of any pharmaceutical company, medical device manufacturer, or healthcare provider.
References
1. Dellon ES, Hirano I. Epidemiology and Natural History of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):319-332.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.067
2. Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á, et al. Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in adults and children. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(3):335-358. doi:10.1177/2050640616689552
3. Molina-Infante J, Bredenoord AJ, Dellon ES, et al. Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia: an entity challenging the current definition of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Gut. 2016;65(10):1593-1599. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310991
4. Dellon ES, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Evidenced Based Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(12):1890-1912. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002011
5. Hirano I. Topical Glucocorticoids for Eosinophilic Esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1428-1430. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1002081
6. Aceves SS, Dohil R, Newbury RO, et al. Topical fluticasone for eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119(5):1116-1122. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.016
7. Straumann A, Conroy H, Zuber M, et al. Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):475-484.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.026
8. Kagalwalla AF, Sentongo TA, Ritz S, et al. Effect of six-food elimination diet on clinical and histologic outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(9):1097-1102. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.06.014
9. Arias A, Pérez-Martínez I, Tenias JM, et al. Efficacy of dietary interventions for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(6):1064-1076.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.003
10. Gonsalves N, Mehta JB, Wechsler JB, et al. Food allergy testing in eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(7):2209-2218.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2019.03.023
11. Markowitz JE, Spergel JM, Ruchelli E, et al. Elemental diet is an effective treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adolescents. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(4):777-782. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07390.x
12. Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, et al. Updated International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Proceedings of the AGREE Conference. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(4):1022-1033.e10. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009

