The promise of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care is tantalizing, but implementation faces significant headwinds. It's not enough to demonstrate efficacy; we must also confront the practical realities of integrating novel treatments into existing healthcare systems. This requires a hard look at regulation, training, and, of course, reimbursement - the unglamorous but essential elements that determine whether a therapy can truly reach patients.

Can we afford to ignore the potential benefits of innovative therapies like ketamine for those facing the end of life? Or are we setting up more barriers than bridges? A recent paper examines this very issue and attempts to map out a responsible path forward for integrating ketamine-assisted psychotherapy into palliative care.

Clinical Key Takeaways

lightbulb

  • The PivotCurrent palliative care models must evolve to incorporate psychedelic-assisted therapies as a viable option for managing psychological distress, necessitating a shift in regulatory and clinical practices.
  • The DataSuccessful integration hinges on addressing the lack of standardized training protocols and clear reimbursement pathways, which currently impede widespread adoption.
  • The ActionClinicians and policymakers should collaborate to develop evidence-based guidelines and advocate for policy changes that support the safe and equitable access to ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care settings.

Current Guidelines and the Evidence Gap

Existing guidelines for palliative care, such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), primarily focus on managing physical symptoms and psychosocial distress through conventional methods. These guidelines often recommend antidepressants, anxiolytics, and psychotherapy. Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy is not yet a standard recommendation, reflecting the nascent stage of evidence supporting its use in this context. The lack of robust, large-scale clinical trials creates uncertainty about its efficacy and safety, hindering its inclusion in established treatment protocols. This absence leaves clinicians and institutions hesitant to adopt ketamine-assisted psychotherapy without clearer direction from leading medical societies.

Ketamine Delivery Models in Palliative Settings

Several models for delivering ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care are emerging. These range from specialized outpatient clinics to integrated programs within hospice settings. Each model presents unique challenges. Outpatient clinics may face regulatory hurdles related to controlled substances and the need for specialized monitoring equipment. Hospice programs, on the other hand, must adapt their existing care pathways to accommodate the time-intensive nature of ketamine-assisted therapy, which includes pre- and post-therapy counseling sessions, as well as the administration itself. Furthermore, staffing requirements differ significantly from traditional palliative care, demanding trained therapists, nurses, and physicians experienced in psychedelic-assisted therapies.

Ethical Considerations and Risk Management

The ethical considerations surrounding ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care are multifaceted. Informed consent is paramount, especially given the potential for altered states of consciousness and the vulnerability of patients facing end-of-life decisions. Clinicians must carefully assess patients' capacity to understand the risks and benefits of this treatment. Risk management strategies are essential to mitigate potential adverse events, such as psychological distress, dissociation, or cardiovascular complications. These strategies include thorough patient screening, continuous monitoring during therapy sessions, and readily available crisis intervention resources. Ensuring equitable access to ketamine-assisted psychotherapy is another critical ethical concern, as financial barriers and geographic limitations may disproportionately affect underserved populations.

Reimbursement Challenges and Financial Sustainability

The financial sustainability of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care hinges on addressing significant reimbursement challenges. Currently, there are no specific billing codes for ketamine-assisted psychotherapy, forcing providers to rely on a combination of existing codes for psychotherapy, medication administration, and supportive care. This patchwork approach often results in inadequate reimbursement, making it difficult for programs to cover their costs. Furthermore, many insurance companies consider ketamine-assisted psychotherapy experimental or investigational, leading to coverage denials. Developing new care pathways and payment models that accurately reflect the complexity and value of this treatment is essential to ensure its long-term viability. Advocacy efforts aimed at educating payers about the potential cost-effectiveness of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy, particularly in reducing end-of-life suffering and associated healthcare utilization, may help to improve reimbursement rates.

Limitations and Future Directions

This analysis, while thorough, is limited by its reliance on existing literature and expert opinion, rather than primary data. Further research is needed to quantify the economic impact of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care, including its effects on hospital readmissions, symptom management, and overall quality of life. The absence of standardized protocols and outcome measures also makes it difficult to compare the effectiveness of different delivery models. Future studies should focus on developing and validating these protocols, as well as conducting randomized controlled trials to assess the clinical and economic benefits of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in diverse palliative care settings. We must also consider the generalizability of findings from specialized centers to community-based hospice programs.

The lack of specific billing codes creates a significant barrier, requiring palliative care programs to navigate complex and often inadequate reimbursement pathways. This uncertainty discourages investment in the necessary infrastructure and training. Furthermore, the perception of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy as experimental can lead to coverage denials, shifting the financial burden to patients and their families. This financial toxicity disproportionately affects vulnerable populations already burdened by the costs associated with end-of-life care. Streamlining billing processes and advocating for appropriate reimbursement policies are essential steps to ensure equitable access to this potentially valuable therapy. We must also explore alternative payment models, such as bundled payments or value-based care arrangements, to incentivize the adoption of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy in palliative care settings.

LSF-7295376157 | December 2025

Save as PDF

Benji Sato
Benji Sato
Health Tech Analyst
An early adopter obsessed with the future of care. Benji covers the "device side" of medicine from AI diagnostic tools to wearable sensors. He bridges the gap between Silicon Valley hype and clinical reality.
How to cite this article

Sato B. Ketamine therapy in palliative care: overcoming systemic hurdles. The Life Science Feed. Published February 9, 2026. Updated February 9, 2026. Accessed February 9, 2026. https://thelifesciencefeed.com/pain-palliative-care/opioid-related-disorders/policy/ketamine-therapy-in-palliative-care-overcoming-systemic-hurdles.

Copyright and license

© 2026 The Life Science Feed. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all content is the property of The Life Science Feed and may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.

Fact-Checking & AI Transparency

This content was produced with the assistance of AI technology and has been rigorously reviewed and verified by our human editorial team to ensure accuracy and clinical relevance.

Read our Fact-Checking Policy

References
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2023). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Palliative Care. Version 2.2023. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1465
  • European Society for Medical Oncology. (2018). ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for palliative care. Annals of Oncology, 29(Supplement 4), iv1-iv41.
  • Anderson, B. A., et al. (2021). Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 85-98.
  • Irwin, S. A., Iglewicz, A., & Nielson, C. (2017). Low-dose ketamine for treatment of depression. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 273-278.
Newsletter
Sign up for one of our newsletters and stay ahead in Life Science
I have read and understood the Privacy Notice and would like to register on the site. *
I consent to receive promotional and marketing emails from The Life Science Feed. To find out how we process your personal information please see our Privacy Notice.
* Indicates mandatory field