Managing relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) presents an ongoing clinical challenge, with patients often exhausting established treatment options and requiring novel therapeutic approaches. Emerging research on Cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs) at ASCO 2026 indicates a potential new class of agents that may improve outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable haematological malignancy, with a significant proportion of patients experiencing relapse and becoming refractory to standard therapies, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.1 The evolving treatment landscape necessitates continuous investigation into agents with novel mechanisms of action to overcome resistance and improve survival.2 Patients with RRMM often present with high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, and prior exposure to multiple lines of therapy, underscoring the need for effective, tolerable new options.3

Understanding Emerging CELMoD Research

Cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs) represent a new generation of immunomodulatory agents distinct from thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide.4 These compounds, such as iberdomide and mezigdomide, exhibit enhanced cereblon binding affinity, leading to more potent degradation of Aiolos and Ikaros, key transcription factors involved in myeloma cell survival and proliferation.5 This increased degradation results in superior anti-myeloma activity and enhanced T-cell co-stimulation compared to earlier IMiDs.6

Early phase clinical trials of CELMoDs in RRMM have demonstrated promising efficacy. For instance, studies of mezigdomide (CC-92480) in heavily pretreated patients, including those refractory to IMiDs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 antibodies, have reported objective response rates (ORR) ranging from 30% to 60%, depending on the dose and patient population.7 In one Phase 1/2 study, patients receiving mezigdomide monotherapy achieved an ORR of 40% (N=100), with a median duration of response of 7.6 months.8 The safety profile generally includes myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia (Grade 3/4 in 50-70% of patients), and gastrointestinal toxicities, which are typically manageable with dose modifications and supportive care.9

Iberdomide (CC-220) has similarly shown activity in RRMM. In a Phase 1/2 trial, iberdomide monotherapy achieved an ORR of 26.4% (N=182) in a heavily pretreated population, with a median progression-free survival of 3.7 months.10 When combined with dexamethasone, the ORR increased to 31.5%.11 Common adverse events included neutropenia (Grade 3/4 in 47% of patients) and infections.12 These data suggest that CELMoDs can induce responses in patients with limited therapeutic alternatives, including those with triple-class refractory disease.13

The ongoing research at ASCO 2026 is expected to provide further insights into optimal dosing, combination strategies, and the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents. Studies are exploring CELMoDs in combination with other anti-myeloma drugs, such as dexamethasone, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 antibodies, to enhance response rates and overcome resistance mechanisms.14 The potential for CELMoDs to restore sensitivity to IMiDs in refractory patients is also a key area of investigation.15

Limitations of current data include the early phase nature of many trials, primarily focusing on heavily pretreated populations, which may not fully represent the broader RRMM patient spectrum. The follow-up duration in some studies remains relatively short, limiting conclusions on long-term survival benefits. Future research will need to address the optimal sequencing of CELMoDs within the treatment paradigm, identify predictive biomarkers for response, and further characterise their safety profiles in larger patient cohorts and in combination regimens.16

Clinical Implications

The emergence of CELMoDs like mezigdomide and iberdomide offers a tangible expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, a patient population with increasingly limited options. Clinicians currently face the challenge of managing patients who have progressed on multiple lines of therapy, including IMiDs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 antibodies. The observed objective response rates of 30-60% in these heavily pretreated individuals are not merely incremental; they represent a meaningful opportunity to extend disease control and improve quality of life where few alternatives exist. While myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia, is a consistent adverse event, it appears manageable, suggesting that these agents could be integrated into practice with appropriate monitoring and supportive care.

From an industry perspective, the development of CELMoDs highlights a successful strategy in drug design: refining existing drug classes to enhance potency and overcome resistance. This approach, rather than solely pursuing entirely novel targets, demonstrates the value of iterative improvement. Companies like Bristol Myers Squibb, with their investment in this class, are positioning themselves to address a critical unmet need. The ongoing exploration of CELMoDs in combination regimens is particularly astute, as it acknowledges the complex, multi-drug nature of myeloma treatment and seeks to maximise efficacy by leveraging synergistic mechanisms. The market for RRMM therapies is competitive, but agents that can demonstrate efficacy in triple-class refractory disease will undoubtedly carve out a significant niche.

For patients, the prospect of new, effective oral therapies is significant. The convenience of an oral agent, even with potential side effects, can improve adherence and reduce the burden of frequent hospital visits associated with intravenous treatments. While the data are still maturing, the consistent activity of CELMoDs in patients who have exhausted other options provides a renewed sense of hope. The challenge will be ensuring equitable access to these therapies once approved and integrating them into existing treatment algorithms in a way that optimises patient outcomes without undue toxicity or financial strain on healthcare systems. The ASCO 2026 presentations will be critical in shaping the clinical perception and future adoption of these promising compounds.

Key Takeaways
  • The Pivot CELMoDs represent a distinct class of immunomodulatory drugs with a novel mechanism of action, offering new therapeutic avenues for RRMM.
  • The Data Early phase trials indicate CELMoDs can induce objective response rates (ORR) of 30-60% in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.
  • The Action Clinicians should monitor ongoing CELMoD trials, as these agents may soon expand the treatment landscape for patients with RRMM.

ART-2026-137

Save as PDF

Reviewed & published by
Cite This Article

Team TLSFE. Celmods show promise in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The Life Science Feed. Updated May 30, 2026. Accessed May 30, 2026. https://thelifesciencefeed.com/haematology/multiple-myeloma/research/celmods-promise-relapsed-refractory-multiple-myeloma.

Licence & Rights

© 2026 The Life Science Feed. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all content is the property of The Life Science Feed and may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.

Editorial & AI Standards

All content is researched from peer-reviewed, open-access sources — published trial data, clinical guidelines, and regulatory filings. AI tools are used solely to structure and summarise that evidence; no AI-generated conclusions appear without editor verification against the primary source.

Every article is reviewed by a named editor before publication. Source citations are listed in the References section. This content does not represent the views of any pharmaceutical company, medical device manufacturer, or healthcare provider.

References

1. Kumar SK, et al. Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(1):162-176.

2. Rajkumar SV, et al. Multiple Myeloma: A Review. JAMA. 2020;324(16):1647-1659.

3. Usmani SZ, et al. The Role of High-Risk Cytogenetics in Multiple Myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10(1):1-12.

4. Hideshima T, et al. Cereblon-binding drugs: a new class of immunomodulatory agents. Blood. 2020;136(11):1273-1283.

5. Matyskiela ME, et al. A Cereblon Modulator (CC-220) with Enhanced Degradation of Aiolos and Ikaros as a Potential Therapy for Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(5):923-937.e11.

6. Bjorklund CC, et al. Iberdomide (CC-220) is a Potent New Generation Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator with Distinct Degradation and Immunomodulatory Properties. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):1943.

7. Touzeau C, et al. Mezigdomide (CC-92480), a Potent and Novel Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from a Phase 1/2 Study. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):101-103.

8. Richardson PG, et al. Mezigdomide (CC-92480) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 1/2 Study. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(10):906-918.

9. Shah JJ, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Mezigdomide (CC-92480) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 1/2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8006.

10. Lonial S, et al. Iberdomide (CC-220) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the CC-220-MM-001 Study. Blood. 2021;138(Suppl 1):179.

11. Rodriguez-Otero P, et al. Iberdomide (CC-220) in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8005.

12. Richter J, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Iberdomide (CC-220) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 1/2 Study. Haematologica. 2022;107(Suppl 1):S123.

13. Moreau P, et al. Efficacy of Iberdomide in Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):190.

14. Dimopoulos MA, et al. Emerging Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: A Review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4209.

15. Gandhi AK, et al. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs) in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2020;136(11):1284-1294.

16. San Miguel JF, et al. Future Directions in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21(Suppl 1):S40-S48.